The impact of immigration on contemporary society is undeniably significant. Unfortunately, those in authoritative positions—such as politicians, journalists, academics, cultural influencers, and religious leaders—often lack the necessary expertise and professionalism to fully comprehend its complexities. Instead, they frequently resort to simplified expressions, outdated asylum laws, or narratives propagated by external, unelected entities such as NGOs, WHO, and other international organizations.
Politicians, in particular, tend to blur the objectives of immigration, intertwining the pursuit of economic growth with humanitarian efforts. Their judgment is further clouded by the influence of special interest groups advocating for inexpensive labor, whether within the real estate sector, construction and service industries, or the burgeoning NGO sector (estimated at EUR 6 billion in Ireland alone, though precise immigration-related allocations remain elusive).
A notable gap in the ongoing discourse is the critical question of sustainability—how long can the current mass immigration model endure? Former UK Home Secretary Suella Braverman highlighted in her September 2023 speech that the current UN Refugee Convention has expanded the potential pool of asylum claimants by nearly 800 million.
In response to these challenges, the Fair Immigration Protocols have been established to create a foundational framework aimed at optimizing the benefits of immigration. These protocols diligently seek to strike a delicate balance between the interests of the host community and the societies from which immigrants originate, with universal applicability across the global spectrum.
Before delving into the specifics of the Fair Immigration Protocols, it is imperative to identify and address critical areas requiring attention. Key considerations include:
Precision in defining the objectives of immigration for host countries, differentiating between economic motivations and those seeking asylum.
Maximization of the efficient allocation of limited resources in both host and source countries.
Mitigation of potential negative impacts that immigration may exert on both the host country and the immigrant population.
In essence, the Fair Immigration Protocols advocate for a meticulous evaluation of each immigrant based on their promised and anticipated contribution to the host country. The singular objective metric is the net tax contribution, as all other factors are considered subjective. Immigrants are expected to contribute more to the host country than they receive. The threshold is dynamic, contingent upon the overall number of immigrants. As the foreign population percentage rises, greater investment in infrastructure becomes imperative. To globally optimize limited resources and efficiently extend aid, support for asylum seekers should be concentrated near crisis centers.
Comments